Species names in all available languages
Language | Common name |
---|---|
Afrikaans | Hoephoep |
Albanian | Pupëza |
Arabic | هدهد |
Armenian | Հոպոպ |
Assamese | ফণিকতৰা |
Asturian | Bubiella comñn |
Azerbaijani | Şanapipik |
Bangla | মোহনচূড়া |
Basque | Argi-oilarra |
Bulgarian | Папуняк |
Catalan | puput comuna |
Chinese | 戴勝 |
Chinese (Hong Kong SAR China) | 戴勝 |
Chinese (SIM) | 戴胜 |
Croatian | pupavac |
Czech | dudek chocholatý |
Danish | Hærfugl |
Dutch | Hop |
English | Eurasian Hoopoe |
English (Kenya) | Hoopoe |
English (Philippines) | Eurasian Hoopoe |
English (South Africa) | Eurasian/African Hoopoe |
English (United States) | Eurasian Hoopoe |
Faroese | Herfuglur |
Finnish | harjalintu |
French | Huppe fasciée |
French (France) | Huppe fasciée |
Galician | Bubela común |
German | Wiedehopf |
Greek | Τσαλαπετεινός |
Gujarati | ઘંટીટાંકણો |
Hebrew | דוכיפת |
Hindi | हुदहुद |
Hungarian | Búbosbanka |
Icelandic | Herfugl |
Indonesian | Hupo tunggal |
Italian | Upupa |
Japanese | ヤツガシラ |
Korean | 후투티 |
Latvian | Pupuķis |
Lithuanian | Kukutis |
Malayalam | ഉപ്പൂപ്പൻ |
Marathi | हुदहुद |
Norwegian | hærfugl |
Odia | ସାରଣା |
Persian | هدهد |
Polish | dudek |
Portuguese (Angola) | Poupa |
Portuguese (Portugal) | Poupa |
Punjabi (India) | ਚੱਕੀਰਾਹਾ |
Romanian | Pupăză |
Russian | Удод |
Serbian | Pupavac |
Slovak | dudok chochlatý |
Slovenian | Smrdokavra |
Spanish | Abubilla Común |
Spanish (Spain) | Abubilla común |
Swedish | härfågel |
Telugu | కూకుడు పిట్ట |
Thai | นกกะรางหัวขวาน |
Turkish | İbibik |
Ukrainian | Одуд євразійський |
Zulu | umzolozolo |
Revision Notes
Steven G. Mlodinow revised the account. Peter Pyle contributed to the Plumages, Molts, and Structure Page. Arnau Bonan Barfull curated the media.
Upupa epops Linnaeus, 1758
Definitions
- UPUPA
- upupa
- epops
- Epops
The Key to Scientific Names
Legend Overview
Eurasian Hoopoe Upupa epops Scientific name definitions
Version: 2.0 — Published July 19, 2024
Conservation and Management
Conservation Status
Not globally threatened (Least Concern), but declining. See Demography and Populations: Population Status: Trends.
Effects of Human Activity
Habitat Loss and Degradation
In portions of its range, the Eurasian Hoopoe has suffered from the loss of suitable nesting sites due to the removal of old rotting trees and/or the decline of primary cavity nesters, mainly woodpeckers (31). Moreover, in alternative breeding sites, such as in stone walls, broods seem to suffer from increased predation (24). This has been partly countered by nestbox programs in places such as Switzerland and Germany (158, 202). Nestboxes may modify the ecological constraints suffered by populations that use natural holes, mainly reducing the risk of predation and increasing clutch size (210, 211, 212). In Europe, intensifying agriculture and the mechanical treatment of soil in agricultural areas has negatively impacted the abundance of the European mole cricket (Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa), an important prey item (213, 132). However, in both Israel and Arabia (which are naturally too arid to host breeding Eurasian Hoopoe), agriculture has increased the species' range and population (75, 43).
Effects of Invasive Species
The Rose-ringed Parakeet (Psittacula krameri) has been introduced into Israel, where it competes with the Eurasian Hoopoe for nest holes (203). The Rose-ringed Parakeet was first found nesting in southern Israel in 2002 in a date (Phoenix dactylifera) grove; subsequently, the breeding density of Eurasian Hoopoe dropped from circa 1.8 pairs/ha to nearly zero from 2001–2009 at one date grove and from 1.2 to 0.4 birds/ha at another (203).
Hunting and Trapping
The Eurasian Hoopoe is hunted or simply shot in parts of the Mediterranean region, Kuwait, and in parts of southeastern Asia (43, 31). In Israel, where hunting/shooting the Eurasian Hoopoe is illegal, hunting by guest workers has been considered a problem (214). However, very little information seems to exist on the extent of these activities elsewhere.
Pesticides and Other Contaminants/Toxics
The use of pesticides in Europe would be expected to decreased European mole crickets populations, and important part of the diet of the Eurasian Hoopoe (215, 132), but the extent of this affect is unknown. A study in Punjab, India found that levels of lead, zinc, and cadmium all increased in the feathers of nestlings between 7–35 d after hatching, likely from being fed insects that had consumed these heavy metals. Mean levels of lead in the feathers rose from 300 ppm/g to 3,000 ppm/g; mean levels of zinc rose from 200 ppm/g to 1,000 ppm/g; and the mean levels of cadmium rose from 100 ppm/g to 700 ppm/g between days 7 and 35 (216). The effects of these heavy metal concentrations on the nestlings was not directly tested, but excessive amounts of these heavy metals in other organisms has been shown to cause detrimental effects on metabolism, survival, and reproduction (216).
Collisions with Stationary/Moving Structures or Objects
Undescribed in the literature.
Human/Research Impacts
None known other than those described in above sections.
Management
Conservation Measures and Habitat Management
Conservation measures have been enacted only at the edges of the Eurasian Hoopoe breeding range. Since 1998, a nestbox program in the Valais area of Switzerland created nest sites in an agricultural area that was quite suitable for breeding, except for the lack of nest holes. From 2002–2010, the population of Eurasian Hoopoe in Switzerland grew at a mean rate of 1.1% per year, a rise strongly correlated with juvenile survival, fecundity, and immigration (158); while fecundity was greatly aided by the nestbox program (217), immigration was also important to the population increase, emphasizing the need for a broad rather than local perspective for population studies, and the development of wide-scale conservation actions (157, 158). A nestbox program in Germany has also been successful (202).
Crucial for the rapid and massive restoration of the Valais, Switzerland Eurasian Hoopoe population was the availability of a detailed, evidence-based set of conservation recommendations (77). By identifying the lack of suitable nesting opportunities as the principal cause of decline in the study area, suitable guidelines could be generated and applied (204). Not surprisingly, the subsequent massive installation of nestboxes caused a sudden spatial shift of breeding pairs from the foothill slopes to the valley plain (217). The sudden close proximity of suitable breeding opportunities to optimal foraging grounds led to a significant increase in reproductive output (204, 134).
In the southwestern France, the creation of openings within or adjacent to woodlands along with provision of nestboxes has been advocated for (122), but no formal program has been initiated.